There seems to be a lot of technical studies, some with a DNA components, that are leaning to Central Asia as a general percursor for most north hemisphere Aryan “white” folks. My study of my surname and my DNA does support this notion fully, as I believe I can show this to be the case. Buryan’s of Siberia places this a bit more eastward (Haplogroup R1a1, and marker M45). I believe part of this lies within a tribes name, where DNA “does not” provide a name, and early dates tend to “culture” names in lieu of specific tribal names, in most cases. An example would be Kurgen Culture of Central Asia, which my personal DNA suggests as marker M17 in Central Asia at 10-15,000 BC.

The name Buring is a derivation I’ve yet to explore, but I believe you’ve spent time on this and see my relationships as written herein. If possible, feel free to contact me direct as I’ve written 300-400 pages of text, and want to publish this data. I believe this name may be the only “exclusive” name capable of supporting such a large time scale over global territories, because the name’s known at ~20,000 BC is slim, I haven’t heard of anyone suggesting a surname that can tie this together. The tribal maps I’ve reviewed for cave man type tribes in Asia or Siberia doesn’t sound like any surnames I’m aware of except for Buryan. Thus, there just aren’t many name to work with, and most are unusual. Example: Yakuts. I don’t know anyone called Yakut as a suname, or even a close match variant. Some historians suggest I’m a bit over-extended, but yet also careful not to shut me out completely, as to those matters they themselves haven’t looked at so closely, as a safety net, and which I see as a professional position. Afterall, we all know important and specific historical data is missing in many cases, and/or intentionally destroyed is many cases. Thus, one needs to be “very” open-minded, and yet meticulous as to how data is weighted in to theories. I’ve assembled data for 30+ years on this name before this picture emerged. I tested my own DNA because I couldn’t believe these results either. I’m seeking peer review of this so these factors can be realized by all historians, which I think would help the current state of affairs in general.

None-the-less, It will take considerable time to win people over to my views and studies concerning this topic.

Romania is also entangled into this and I do believe with Internet search engines, this may now be able to be configured faster due to the inter-global historical data exchange, and access to data by layman like me. If I can deal with Siberia and American Indians at 15-20,000 BC, I should be able to deal with Stonehanges, as they tend to be a Hyperborean construct to me, and Hyperboreans tend toward Buryan=Borean. Bore in Tater Russian and Turkic has a meaning as “wolf”.

Baybars (Egyptian Mamluk dynasty) was born in Crimea as a Russian Bashkort. Baskhortostan (also Bashkirs) come from S. Altay region, then S. Urals, then Crimea later. Their mythology shows the wolf, but some believe Bashkort translates as “head of the wolf”. Baybars also defeated Ghengis Khan from entering Egypt. He was prior to, a Syrian slave sold to Egypt where he later became a commander in the Egyptian army, then Emperor thereafter. He would be an S. Ukranian Russian Tater.

(Bashkort/Crimea), by a second defintion, show ancestors were Buryans (Burzyan or Burzhan). Bees and honey are a big part of Bashkortostan today, as well as a Burzyan province. This places Bashkorts in this period by Romania. On the other hand, Genghis Khan is also Siberian, where it is believed Mongolians came from. Here, not as Han Chinese so much, but Huns. Both Atilla and Genghis (Chingghis, means ocean-where ocean is believed to be Lake Baikal) are of the Borjinin tribe, who’s mythology provides Burte Chino (Blue Wolf, or Adam) as Mongolian creator story. This justifies the Great Wall of China as they didn’t care so much for each other.

Thus, Babars was fighting his own cousins, although he likely didn’t know this. We are constantly fighting our own cousins according to my timeline for tribal evolution of Modern Humans to civil states such as Sumeria, a very early civilized culture.

Stone-henges straddle this timeline evolutionary point which is just old enough to hamper one in finding “good” historical references on. The Buryan name though “can” be found in names (rivers and such) in Romania. Targeted study to this end “may” prove rewarding.

My email is Thanks again for the kind remarks. I believe my findings will hold their own ground, and want the “highest degree” of critique either in favor of, or not in favor of, as a de-personallized way of moving forward. Generallized statements, as some responses implied here, have no merit. Real data is required to support any position concerning these topics, and data exchange. I have many more hunches, but my comments here are from real data I have reviewd, weighted, and have cross-references on for many cases.
Yet, I’m filling in timeline gaps to the extent I can, and Romania “is” a difficult region to study.

I do agree with the comment that this tribe has been greatly overlooked by most historians. I believe this is because the tribe is, and has always been rather small. Their “visabilty” is very low and historians tend to major events as key steps. Smaller tribes get consolidate in (integrated), or left by the wayside. This name actually fills many missing gaps in historical evolution of tribal names, as suggest by the reponse by Buring. I’m happy someone seems to agree with my deductions, so far.

This name is available also in England, Scotland, and Ireland (Hibernia, from Iberia) where other henges can be found, and where nobody seems to be able to configure whose race built all of this. I believe this can be figured out, eventually.

Best wishes. I hope to here from all interested parties as this name can, and will change our impressions on who we are. This I’m sure of, and as eluded to from the last responder who seems to have enough vision to see this, too. But, exchange of hard data would be useful to all concerned. My hypothesis I’ve named the Grand Global Genome (as: GGG hypothesis) where Buryans circumnavigated to globe, too, and also includes American Indians (see Atsina tribe, Montana, USA-Canada).

Also, is an European geneological site for this name. I’m pretty much independant from this site, but some of my data is posted therein, too.

Thus, the GGG concept should be referenced as such to isolate my particular take on these factors. Best Wishes, RPB. Lets work together. Burian’s should claim what heritage is their’s alone, in my opinion.

My understanding is that Buryan-Siberia is equivalent to Burjan in Arabic, and that al-Burjan is a geographical lands location descibed in Iranian mythology. There is the Siberian Buryan as “Sky-God”, and Russians suggest that 1st Nordic god “Buri”, and his sons, Borri, Bor (Greek Hyperborean), Wodan (Oden,Odin) can be derived from Buryan across “northern territories”. My study suggests an Asia Minor route. Thus, Romania encompasses this evolution as also suggested by Thrace.

Thrace is now Bulgaria. Bulgarians and Burjans (Burdjans) are each others cousins vis-a-vis, as are also Burgundians in some historical studies. I believe Burjans can be traced all around the Black Sea

The region called “Colchus” is Georgia today, but was the Iranian “al-Burjan” mythology location. The epic “Jason and the Argonauts” is testimony to this because the “Golden Fleece” was held by the Colchus people. Argonauts must have been Burjans, because the epic was written hundreds of years later and I would think Greeks wouldn’t have known, or remembered these factors when written.
A second part of this is Lemnos Island in the Aegean, where Burjans and Amazons shared the Island. In the Epic, this was Jason’s 1st stop, and they feared the Amazon women-warriors as “men-killers”. Amazons were neighbors to Burjans in the Pontic, by Georgia, and also on Lemnos Island. A third part of this is the Lemnos Island god Hephaestos, Zeus’s son, whom Zeus kicked out of Mt. Olympus (due to the fact he sacrificed a child), and he thereafter resided on Lemnos Island. My date for this is ~15,000 B.C.

The Azerbaijan question I’ve been working, but I don’t have a definitive answer. I one approach, Azer=As=Ass people + Baijan. If Burjan= Buryan (Lake Baikal-Siberia), then the Bai-jan seems to mimic Bai-kal. I can relate village names to Georgia, Anatolia, Aremenia, and Azerbaijan regions, but older references are hard to find maps for, and some have been renamed. Baijan would represent a unique version for a Burjan-Buryan derived spelling variant. I can obtain both Bulgar and Burjan migrations through this region, however, my DNA test suggest much higher concentration as East Iran, and low concentrations in West Iran (Azerbaijan).

I have maps that show Georgia=al-Burjan (Burdjan)=Cholchus.

I also believe Burjan is Iberian. This may help with the Asia Minor question. Caucasus Iberians and Burjans would both be miners and forgers (blacksmiths). Hepheastos was the god of the forge, and is equivalent to Germanic-Thor, as the both are symbollized by the hammer (also Egypt-Ptah). I believe the word “steel” is Iberian. They were alchemist and knew how to “harden steel”. Thus, Romanian mining would be likewise connectible when, or if, these people came to this region. I haven’t looked at this factor-region yet concerning mines.

If Buri=Bori, i.e. Hyperboreans, Romania has the correct credendials of location, and time period to allow a Hyperborean built henge, and be able to also connect this to “Stonehenge” England, and the “Callenish” henge Scotland. Because Stonehenge is dated to ~2500 BC, and a second “Bronze Age” ~1500AD additions, this would imply similar dates for Romania, if, these henges are common to the same people who built them.

At ~170 AD, Ptolomy “flat world” maps indicates Ireland as Hibernia, located in the Hyperborean Sea. My belief is that Ireland=Hibernia=Iberia=Burjan=Hyperborean, where Burjan=Buryan=Buri=Bor.

Note in Spain you have the Bora mint (Iberians, or Celtiberians), and Celtiberian coins dated from ~400 BC exibit wolves (pre-Roman-Spain). Greece Argos coins exhibit wolves. Lemnos Island Amazon coins exhibit wolves.

The movie “Gladiator” is the Germanic “Buri” tribe fighting the Romans at about 200AD, in the upper Vistula River region of Poland (Buren village). In the movie, this tribe is represented with a wolf spirit. In Croatia, there is a Wolf Valley, where Burjan (Burdjan) can be regionally traced, and, in this era, Burdjan meant “the wolf’s soul”, clearly demonstrated in this movie. This would help explain a Daci=Daos=wolf, and also =Denmark (Latin).

These are some of the main factors revolving around this Romanian henge and its builders, which I’m leaning to a Hyperborean construct, and connected to other henges as the same percursors. Also as moon-solar alignments, not as astronomical. Reading can be found at “Solving Stonehenge” Anthoney Johnson (Thames and Hudson, 2008). This research parallels mine to a high degree, but I’m concerned with the tribal name evolution, not just henges.

I don’t believe many Hyperboreans (Palasgians) remained in Greece as the gods Zeus and another son, Apollo would suggest, but that as also indicated to be weak for the R1a1 haplogroup, my haplogroup, if Burian is a Borean related name. R1a1 tends to be more “Northern” peoples as the Nordic god Buri suggest.

Because Odin (Buri’s son) can be traced to Troy, it becomes highly probable for a Romanian/Thracian connection to the very early dates as henges suggest.

Note that Romanian Dacian Draco’s (wolf-dragons) can be found carved on Trajans column Rome. There is also a Celtiberian-Draco, Spain. I believe these come from Kipchaks (Qypchaqs), Central Asian Steppes, and Buryans are part of the Kipchak clans, and both later part of the Golden Horde. Thus, this verifies statements from the other responder, and provides a tracable artifact, i.e. Draco.

This is also the Biblical “Gog”, i.e. the “wolf of the north”, or the anti-Christ. In the Tower of Babel, this is of the sons of Noah, Japeth, Torgarmah (believed to reside in Armenia), and shown in English as Bulgar (a Latin word), where Bulgar=Burjan, and where Bulgar=Balhara (Bactria) at ~20,000 BC. They became Daghestan Bulgars (N. Capsian Sea where Daghestan=Dogsland. So this also encompasses the previos responder, and provides definition concerning Capsian region. Note S. Capsian as Hycania (Land of Wolves). Fort Gust-i-Burjan in Iran is dated ~100 BC. Anyway, I don’t have conflict with Asia Minor, or S. Black Sea regions concerning Burjans in Romania at very early dates, supportable by biblical script too. In biblical terms, Gog would be known in the book of Genesis, and carry over to Revalations and “end times” for the Biblical prophecy of Gog to be fulfilled.

I personally look a bit like the Motti highland Romanians. but, I am also Bohemian, Czech.

I’m hoping this aids other responders with more technical details for my take on this henge, and “perhaps”, the people who built it. This should also allow a “wolf” tamga as part of studies concerning henges in general, and tell-tale symbols (such as Draco’s) derived therefrom.

Thanks for the blog concerning henge sanctuaries.

Now going back to prehistoric tribes and migrations . . . looks to me from my readings that the Dacians were pretty closely related to the Thracians if not just the same people with a slightly different accent. Thracians, of course, were red-haired, blue-eyed, tatooed barbarians that no civilized Greek would admit to speaking to, but they made pretty good liquor and could hold it until they picked up their axes and started to howl at the moon (usually around midnight, when most of the army was finally settling in to bed with a nice girlfriend). Anyway, we know that the Thracians (T!rakiae in 300 BC) came from points east, probably around the southern Black Sea coast, at last during the preceding three centuries, and who knows where before that? If you attach the “Getae” (Geto-Dacians, Daco-Getae) tag that some use, you have to consider, what might be the relationship between the Classically-reported Getae, whose reply to Alexander’s questions reveal traditions well-known in later Celtic sources far to the west (and not to forget that in fact, Galatia in Turkey is the linguistic relic of the last Gaulic invasion of southern Europe, during the reign of Lysimachos in Thracia), to the Getes of Beowulf, Sweden, and northern Russia, as well as the later Goths (vowel-shifts are so common as to occur within less than a century, and the transition from a plosive T! to the modern “th” sound, is documented as ongoing in Greek during historical times, between 400 BCE and 400 AD).

Ultimately all the Indo-Europeans including both Persians and Hindus as well as Armenians and Azerbajani, can trace themselves back to the horse-domesticating steppe-riders from somewhere around the north of the Caspian sea, circa 3500 BCE. And those horse-riders probably had a lot of genes in common with modern Russians, in terms of genetic large size, not very dark hair but a lot of it, and a higher lactose tolerance than most peoples who went farther east earlier. Oh, and probably fewer Neanderthal genes than those of us whose ancestors came mostly from farther west in Europe.

If you want to talk (not argue), trade sources, follow up leads and ruminate about prehistory, write me at cynndara@yahoo.com. I don’t check it often, but then, did you ever even expect a comment on a site about Romanian monasteries?

I will also note that the Hyperborean (Greek for extreem-north) god Boreas (who exhibits wings) would visit his homeland in the north during the Year of Menton, by flying North (in also winged chariots) to get there. Zeus and Apollo Greek gods are also believed to be of Hyperborean (Palasgian) origins.

Hyperborea and Atlantis haven’t been located, so these factors remain in the realm of mythical characters from mythology.

Also, the Mayan calendar may or may not be related to Hyperboreans, who may be Bulgarians, and thus a relationship to the Bulgarian “highly accurate” calendar and the Bulgarian present day location by Romania. The Mayan calendar is also unusually accurate, and exhibits great depth in concept for astronomy suggesting this possible relationship.

I believe the “Year of Menton” is a soley Hyperborean concept inter-related to England’s Stonehenge layout (circular distribution and number of post hole points) and the number 56. (ref; Solving Stonehenge, Anthony Johnson, published by Thames and Hudson 2008).

I hope this will clarify my own mistake in previous comments herein.

Thus my last name are of these same people. Note the city or village Burjanfalva (now Paulis) in Romanian/Transylvanian history.

My great-grandfather came to USA in 1882 from Prague, as Bohemian. This Dacian region is a stepping-stone migration pathway therein. This is also the “wolf-warrior” clans which I think you’ll find agreeable with the Dacians and your reference to Zeus and Apollo, who was actually “wolf’ Zeus on Wolf Mountain in Greece. These Hyperboreans were also called Palasgians, but are actually Hyperboreans, ie. who called themselves Vans. The Veneti (of Liburnia) and from Lake Van were of the same ancestors. The Veneti language is indentified and linkable as such. The aboriginal people by Lake Van were Subarians, which i read as Su-Barians, ie. Buryans. Any comments?

Also, I would suggest looking at the newer “Borean” language hypothesis published in the year 2000 (Russian) made available recently in web based Wikipedia. This newer theory I believe to be correct, and it may cure your questions as to Altaic and/or Indo-European (IE) language theories.

Note that Buddah’s original name from Iran (he was a blond-hair and blue-eyed Sakastan prince, or a Saka (Scythian), before going to India, and his name (I think as quasi-Persian was Bury/xan. This y/x is a Persian hybrid character I can’ t reproduce as English. Anyway, he was a Buryan. Thus, some of these factors – I think – are solvable. Note that Saka coins of (Iran) exhibit “Zeus” – as commented about on your web page – pertaining to anybody wondering about Asian or Indo-European inputs.

There is also fort Gust-i Burjan in Iran from 200-100 B.C.
I tested my DNA and have these markers, ie. Siberia, India (Hindi), Iran, etc., and I also have this as a surname, thus I can substantiate these factors – I believe.

All domesticated dogs from DNA studies exhibit the Siberian “wolf” DNA ancestors. Buryans of Siberia is the origin of “wolf-warriors”, and also, all domesticated dogs too. Dacians were of this bloodline, or an affiliate or confederated version of tribes from this “Tamga” or symbolic tribal descent. A date for this Wolf-Dog event would be ~20-30,000 BC in Siberia, as the Amercan Indians migrated from Siberia at about this period, and they brought the dog with them. Thus, this pre-dates “all” wolf parables, unless someone would like to “add” perhaps an earilier version, which I don’t expect to here about soon. National Geographic released a film pertaining to these dog-DNA-Siberian studies for the skeptics who read this.

Also, my Siberia-Afro DNA can also be matched to to Grimaldi-Venus artifacts dug up in Malta and Buret, located within ~ 80 km of Lake Baikal, home of Buryats, also from Ice Age – Buryans.

Both Central Asia, and India are merely stepping-stones to this common migration westward during the earliest epic of Modern Humans, who arrived in Siberian regions at 22,000-25,000 B.C. – the age of these Afro-Siberian artifacts – and my Afro-Siberia DNA that I’ve already tested. The word Siberia – I think – is Si-Beria, which is Buryans too. I think you’ll find my inputs ring true.

Can anyone confirm or provide a second definition from my studies of Dacians?

Thanks for your web data. Also, I would like to receive credit for my inputs and use of my name as Authorship for perhaps “newer’” concepts would be appreciated. I’m also willing to receive e-mail from interested parties for comment.

I’ve been writing a quasi-book on my studies of my surname since 1973, and hope to get a published (1st Edition) version by the end of this year, as I have quite a bit of research pertaining to this name, and its ancient, and global relevance, I’m totally amazed at the path I’ve ended up on once enough factors were obtained to start to make sense out some sort of evolution therefrom, which is how my research is directed. I have “many” versions of this name.

Also, the Dacian – Burebista (Greek) name I think might originate as Buri, or of the Buri tribe. Any comments?

Also, Dacian Burzenland I believe to be Goth-Buryans too.
There is an eastern version as Buryzan which to me becomes obvious. Bashkirs/Bashkorts of Central-Asia are Buryan “wolf-warriors” too. Ref; Baskhortostan Russia.

Comment welcome. PS, I hope I haven’t overwhelmed responders for these comments, realizing Dacia is a very difficult region to pick-apart, but I do believe “this can be done’” – at least eventually. I believe I’m on the right path, and this is a rather new and different approach perhaps at disecting the Dacian relationships, and the ruins and artifacts found in Dacia today which can be yet further extrapolated and rationallized